Identification and initial review of key literature
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Identification and initial review of key literature
Assessment Details
There is one element of assessment for this module:
A Research Proposal – This is an individual assessment and accounts for 100% of the mark for the module. As a means of achieving the aims and objectives of this module, and also to enable us to make an informed choice about appropriate supervisor, it is important that you develop a well thought out research proposal. You are required to produce a proposal which you will use as the basis for undertaking your MSc dissertation. At this stage it is only what you intend to do as you will not have carried out the actual research yet. The chosen research topic must be related to one or more of the academic areas covered by your Masters programme.
The maximum word count for the research proposal is 4000 words.
Detailed guidance on the Structure of your Research Proposal can be found on Moodle but the format should be as follows:
1) Title: Use a provisional title for the dissertation.
2) Introduction (10% weighting)
In this section, you should contextualise the rationale for your proposed research. For example:
- What functional areas of business you are drawing upon?
- Seminal literature (a couple or so references) you are using to illustrate the academic underpinning of the research.
- The practitioner or work-based context that leads you to examine this topic.
- What you have studied in programme that will help you in this research topic.
- Your particular background and motivation for the proposed research.
- Why this research project is potentially important, perhaps by reference to how it might assist industry, organisations or practitioners?
3) Aim and Objectives (20% weighting)
Here there should be a very clear statement of the overall aim of the research, leading on from the introduction.
Typically, there will be three or four specific objectives to enable you to achieve your main aim and it is likely that these will incorporate an academic element (perhaps ‘testing’ a hypothesis or basing your research/analysis on an existing framework or theory), and practical perspective relating to the workplace/sector/industry. The balance between the two is dependent on the research topic selected, but the academic focus must be visible at this stage.
A brief justification of why these aims and objectives are appropriate is also useful to clarify the focus of the proposal.
4) Identification and initial review of key literature (25% weighting)
In the course of your reading, you are required to identify a minimum of ten key literature sources which you believe inform your proposed research.
These sources should incorporate journal articles, textbooks, practitioner-based articles/trade press, industry/organisation reports, (quality) news media articles and/or relevant and credible websites. The use of Edinburgh Napier’s online library resource NUINlink to access journal articles from Emerald, Ingenta, ABI Inform databases etc. is expected and you should normally cite such articles as the core material in this section.
When writing this section, compare and contrast the literature (as you will eventually do in the main project) using the APA 6th citation style and ensure there is continuity and a logical link between the references and themes introduced. (Detailed references of your cited authors would then appear in the ‘References’ section at the end of your proposal)
5) Research Approach (25% weighting)
Here you should allude to the methodology and methods to be used in your research. These should be supported by references to the business research texts relating to methods, a selection of which has been given in the lectures and on the Moodle e.g. Bryman and Bell (2015), Fisher (2010), Saunders et al. (2016), Yin (2009) etc. More specifically, a clear indication of the methods of data collection and analysis that you plan to use should be evident in this section.
You might consider the following in writing this section of your proposal:
- are you going to use a casestudy of a particular organisation or a smaller number of organisations?
- will you carry out a survey of a large number of organisations in an industry to explore the objectives and aims of your research?
- are you using mixed methods?
- why have you chosen the selected research method(s)?
- what are the strengths and weaknesses of your research method(s)?
- how are you going to analyse the data you have assembled/collected?
This section should also identify any ethical issues which need addressing in your primary data collection e.g. anonymity, confidentiality, informed consent etc. You should adhere to the guidelines of the University, as well general good practice principles and those unique to certain organisations e.g. the UK’s NHS, if appropriate. The University’s guidelines can be downloaded from the following link:
You are also required to complete a Research Integrity Approval form (see Appendix 1) and hand this in with your research proposal. Please note you are not graded on this.
6) Research Plan (10% weighting)
You should identify the key events in your research plan and then provide a concise and realistic timetable which shows how they are linked, when they will take place and how long they will last. You can do this as a Microsoft Word table or a Gantt Chart (e.g. Fisher, 2010; Bryman and Bell, 2015), accounting for each week and month between now and until submission of the project.
This section may also contain additional commentary pertaining to any particular characteristics or nuances of the research and its schedule that may need highlighting.
7) Reference List (10% weighting, not counted as part of your word count)
You should provide an alphabetical list of all references used in your research proposal, based on the Business School referencing system.
Take care when listing web references (which should be kept a minimum) to include the author’s name, article title and date accessed.
Research Proposal – Assessment Feedback
Student Name: Submission Date: Matriculation No: Date marked: Module: Research Methods (SOE11131) Cohort: Provisional Title of Dissertation: Proposal Area Indicative Weighting Comments Introduction 10% Aim and Objectives 20% Identification and Initial Review of Key Literature 25% Research Design 25% Research Plan 10% Reference List 10%
Areas of Strength: Areas to Improve:
Overall Result: Marked by: YOUR MARK IS PROVISIONAL AND IS SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION OR ALTERATION BY THE PROGRAMME BOARD OF EXAMINERS
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!