introduction to DB implementation plans
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
introduction to DB implementation plans
Summary:
TOPIC: Write an original research report consisting of one of the following topic areas: 1) Virtual Organizations, 2) Network Organizations, 3) Spin-out Organizations, 4) Ambidextrous Organizations, 5) Front-Back Organizations, 6) Sense and Response Organizations.
- The final Research Report has a due date of.
- This assignment is worth 100 points (20% of the course grade).
- The assignment must be submitted via the associated assignment queue located in Moodle.
- Each student submission will be checked for plagiarism. Warning… Turnitin has a very good and historical memory and is capable of accessing reports from both internal and external resources (i.e. Universities, Governments, etc.) including those originally written in non-English languages.
- Only one submission attempt is permitted – BE SURE BEFORE YOU HIT ENTER. Plagiarism will result in a grade of zero (non-negotiable) for the assignment and may results in other university actions. The department chairperson will be notified of the violation. Additional CU penalties may be applicable. Please see class syllabus for additional details.
- Acceptable file formats for submissions include Microsoft Word (doc, docx) or Adobe Acrobat (PDF). Other formats are not acceptable.
- The research paper must be at least 2,500 words supported by evidence (citations from peer-reviewed sources).
- A minimum of four (4) peer-reviewed journal citations are required.
- Formatting should be double-spaced, one-inch boarders, no extra space for headings, no extra white space, no more than two levels of heading, page numbers, front and back matter).
10.Extra white space use to enhance page count will negatively affect student grade.
11.Focus for the research paper:
- Describe, compare / contrast, and evaluate two (2) database implementations in your field of interest. You may also want to consider referencing journal case studies.
- The first implementation should be a database that was essentially successful
- The second implementation should be a database that had significant “challenges”
- The databases may either be ones with which you are personally familiar or ones that are reported in the literature
- Be sure to go well beyond just personal opinion in your analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Student submissions must be anchor in peer reviewed literature.
12.As a graduate student, you are expected to be proficient in the use of the English language. Errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax will affect student grade . As your professor, I will not provide remedial help for writing problems. If you are unable to write clearly and correctly, I urge you to contact the program office for sources of remedial help.
Some students have asked for a sample or recommended outline. While I cannot provide samples of previous work, I have provided a general outline that you may refer to. The outline below may only be used as a very general guide and is “NOT” a subject that can be selected. Also, keep in mind the research paper needs to be scholarly and derived from peer-reviewed literature. Citations are required.
The following outline (unrelated to the subject matter of the research report) may help in your understanding of the research report via analysis & synthesis.
1) Introduction:
- a) Introduce the 2 DB implementations plans. Add history and relative significance of each consumer and DB products.
- b) One implementation should be a database that was essentially successful.
- c) The second implementation should be a database that had significant “challenges”.
- d) What type of research papers was used (case study, empirical, etc.)?
2) Describe, compare/contrast, and evaluate two (2) database – ANALYSIS
- a) What is the problem driving the implementation? What is ‘going wrong’ or what ‘problem’ was expected to be addressed?
- b) What were the implementation requirements
- i) Expectations
- ii) Project requirements
iii) DB requirements
- iv) Planed resources & time expectations
- c) What were the risks and impact if the implementation failed?
3) Provide a SYNTHESIS of the 2-implementation plans.
- a) What specific issues addressed by article X were also addressed in article Y, and how do they compare?
- b) What issues addressed by article X (or Y) may have been addressed by an alternate solution?
4) Findings
- a) What does your evidence show?
5) Conclusions
- a) What make one DB implementation a success and the other have significant challenges?
- b) What mitigating factors were, or should have been, considered?
6) Recommendations
- a) Future investigation
7) Reference List
Summary:
TOPIC: Write an original research report consisting of one of the following topic areas: 1) Virtual
Organizations, 2) Network Organizations, 3) Spin
–
out Organizations, 4) Ambidextrous Organizations, 5)
Front
–
Back Organizations, 6) Sense and Response Organi
zations.
1.
The final Research Report has a due date of.
2.
This assignment is worth 100 points (20% of the course grade).
3.
The assignment must be submitted via the associated assignment queue located in Moodle.
4.
Each student submission wi
ll be checked for plagiarism
.
Warning… Turnitin has a very good
and historical memory and is capable of accessing reports from both internal and external
resources (i.e. Universities, Governments, etc.) including those originally written in non
–
English
l
anguages.
5.
Only one submission attempt is permitted
–
BE SURE BEFORE YOU HIT ENTER. Plagiarism
will result in a grade of zero (non
–
negotiable) for the assignment and may results in other
university actions. The department chairperson will be notified
of the violation. Additional CU
penalties may be applicable.
Please see class syllabus for additional details.
6.
Acceptable file formats for submissions include Microsoft Word (doc, docx) or Adobe Acrobat (PDF).
Other formats are not acceptable.
7.
The research paper must be at least 2,500 words supported by evidence (citations from peer
–
reviewed sources).
8.
A minimum of four (4) peer
–
reviewed journal citations are required.
9.
Formatting should be double
–
spaced, one
–
inch boarders, no extra
space for headings, no extra white
space, no more than two levels of heading, page numbers, front and back matter).
10.
Extra white space use to enhance page count will negatively affect student grade.
11.Focus for the research paper:
a.
Describe, compa
re / contrast, and evaluate two (2) database implementations in your field of
interest. You may also want to consider referencing journal case studies.
b.
The first implementation should be a database that was essentially successful
c.
The second im
plementation should be a database that had significant “challenges”
d.
The databases may either be ones with which you are personally familiar or ones that are reported in
the literature
e.
Be sure to go well beyond just personal opinion in your ana
lysis, synthesis and
evaluation. Student
submissions must be anchor
in peer reviewed literature.
12.As a graduate student, you are expected to be proficient in the use of the English language.
Errors in
grammar, spelling, or syntax will affect student gr
ade
. As your professor, I will not provide remedial
help for writing problems. If you are unable to write clearly and correctly, I urge you to contact the
program office for sources of remedial help.
Some students have asked for a sample or recommended outline. While I cannot provide samples
of previous work, I have provided a general outline that you may refer to. The outline below may
only be used as a very general guide and is “NOT” a
subject that can be selected. Also, keep in
mind the research paper needs to be scholarly and derived from peer
–
reviewed literature.
Citations are required.
The following outline (unrelated to the subject matter of the research report) may help in your
u
nderstanding of the research report via analysis & synthesis.
1)
Introduction:
Summary:
TOPIC: Write an original research report consisting of one of the following topic areas: 1) Virtual
Organizations, 2) Network Organizations, 3) Spin-out Organizations, 4) Ambidextrous Organizations, 5)
Front-Back Organizations, 6) Sense and Response Organizations.
- The final Research Report has a due date of.
- This assignment is worth 100 points (20% of the course grade).
- The assignment must be submitted via the associated assignment queue located in Moodle.
- Each student submission will be checked for plagiarism. Warning… Turnitin has a very good
and historical memory and is capable of accessing reports from both internal and external
resources (i.e. Universities, Governments, etc.) including those originally written in non-English
languages.
- Only one submission attempt is permitted – BE SURE BEFORE YOU HIT ENTER. Plagiarism
will result in a grade of zero (non-negotiable) for the assignment and may results in other
university actions. The department chairperson will be notified of the violation. Additional CU
penalties may be applicable. Please see class syllabus for additional details.
- Acceptable file formats for submissions include Microsoft Word (doc, docx) or Adobe Acrobat (PDF).
Other formats are not acceptable.
- The research paper must be at least 2,500 words supported by evidence (citations from peer-
reviewed sources).
- A minimum of four (4) peer-reviewed journal citations are required.
- Formatting should be double-spaced, one-inch boarders, no extra space for headings, no extra white
space, no more than two levels of heading, page numbers, front and back matter).
10.Extra white space use to enhance page count will negatively affect student grade.
11.Focus for the research paper:
- Describe, compare / contrast, and evaluate two (2) database implementations in your field of
interest. You may also want to consider referencing journal case studies.
- The first implementation should be a database that was essentially successful
- The second implementation should be a database that had significant “challenges”
- The databases may either be ones with which you are personally familiar or ones that are reported in
the literature
- Be sure to go well beyond just personal opinion in your analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Student
submissions must be anchor in peer reviewed literature.
12.As a graduate student, you are expected to be proficient in the use of the English language. Errors in
grammar, spelling, or syntax will affect student grade. As your professor, I will not provide remedial
help for writing problems. If you are unable to write clearly and correctly, I urge you to contact the
program office for sources of remedial help.
Some students have asked for a sample or recommended outline. While I cannot provide samples
of previous work, I have provided a general outline that you may refer to. The outline below may
only be used as a very general guide and is “NOT” a subject that can be selected. Also, keep in
mind the research paper needs to be scholarly and derived from peer-reviewed literature.
Citations are required.
The following outline (unrelated to the subject matter of the research report) may help in your
understanding of the research report via analysis & synthesis.
1) Introduction:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!