ORG 561 Paper on Contemporary Leadership in a Professional Association
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
You’re an organizational development (OD) expert who specializes in non-leadership groups and movements. You are a member of the Organizational Development Professional Association (ODPA), a global organization whose membership has been continuously declining for the past five years. Last month, the ODPA’s board of directors (Board) conducted a member satisfaction survey, and the results were startling:
In light of the current environment, more than half of ODPA members question the organization’s relevance. Sixty-five percent of ODPA members are independent contractors or work for businesses with fewer than ten employees.
More than 30 percent of members had advanced degrees from 30 years or more ago, more than 50 percent from 10 to 29 years ago, and less than ten percent within the last nine years. Only about 5% of the participants could name one ODPA Board member.
The ODPA executive director (Director) has contacted to see whether you can assist in light of the survey results. The Director, who is based in Toronto, Canada, is worried that the Board is out of touch with current organizational contexts, OD trends, and the growing issues that organizational development professionals face. The current Board of Directors is made up of individuals from Australia, England, Germany, Japan, and the United States. The Board meets once a year in Toronto and once a quarter via web-based conference meetings.As a critical step in raising a sense of urgency about the organization, the Director wishes to “inform” the Board. Otherwise, the Director is concerned that ODPA will not be able to continue. According to the Director, the Board of Directors:
Its leadership function is underappreciated.
Hasn’t embraced the changing demographics of the workforce, which have an impact on membership.
I’m having trouble understanding the differences between classical and autonomist leadership, as well as traditional versus developed leadership theory.
Does not comprehend contemporary leadership discourses.
The Director wants you to lead a Board discussion about organizational risks using the survey data as a springboard. The director has asked you to create a rough copy of the meeting agenda, which should include:The meeting’s purpose (remember your audience)
Attendees and roles (consider the leader/follower positions of everyone in the room, including yourself.) As needed, make and record assumptions. Use scholarly references to back up your claims).The timetable, the place, and the atmosphere (provide reasoned choices with support)
Material for pre-reading (Identify material that attendees should review ahead of the meeting; make and record assumptions as needed)
From 1920 to the present, a historical overview of the leadership field of study is presented (two to three pages)
Incorporate a unique graphic element (less than one-half page within body of the report; unlimited space in appendices)
Explanation of modern leadership in light of the current circumstances (three to four pages)
Incorporate a unique graphic element (less than one-half page within body of the report; unlimited space in Appendices)
Use one of Western’s (2013) four critical inquiry frames to analyze a current leadership book and its relevance to the circumstance (four to five pages)
Questions for the facilitators (design inquiry to draw attendees into a relevant discussion).10 pages (explanation and answer)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
|