Report on Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
I’m looking for help creating a research paper or an essay. In light of the following requirements, there are five outstanding questions about governance, risk, and compliance that must be addressed:
1. The task necessitates regulatory and compliance expertise from someone who is fluent in English.
2. Answers should be given in accordance with US law (perhaps New York), with some similarities to EU law. IT is the field of choice.
2. Please compile the assignment into a single Microsoft Word document.
3. Your name should not appear on your work because all marking is anonymous.
4. Make sure that all of your work is properly cited.
5. This assignment’s total word count should not be less than 3,300. (approx 12 pages). All in-text references and appendices are included, but footnotes, the reference page, and the contents page are not. Note that appendices should only be used in extreme cases and should only contain brief extracts or tables.
6. The amount of words per question segment should be proportional to the number of marks available.
7. Please see the questions below – thank you for your time and effort!Q1
Explain why internationally accepted regulatory standards are vital, emphasizing the advantages of having them in place on both a global and territorial level. Use relevant examples to back up your answer.
NOTES ON DRAWING: The focus is on the various roles of internal stakeholders involved in supporting effective GRC practices within regulated organizations, such as the board of directors, the compliance department, and risk management operations, to name a few. However, regardless of the choices chosen, it is the writer’s ability to support those choices (by considering associated responsibilities, consequent actions, and so on) and present examples to demonstrate knowledge and comprehension. As a result, examples should be obvious, ideally one for each of the stakeholders mentioned, to show how their activities contribute to the overall efficacy of the approach. Supporting effective culture, policies, processes, controls, training, education, and so on are examples of things that could be discussed here, with examiners evaluating efficacy in terms of how well these support their intended purpose and explanation supplied.Q2 Identify two regulatory directives or initiatives that have been implemented, or are being implemented, in a jurisdiction and sector of your choice. Consider the implementation process and demonstrate how it has impacted or has the potential to effect your chosen jurisdiction and sector, as well as a specific regulated firm within that jurisdiction/sector, using practical examples.
Examiners would like to see consideration of topics like international/local standards, jurisdiction/sector aims and objectives, global initiatives/focus, and the like, with practical examples provided in the draft.
Q3 Describe the evaluation done by the regulator of a sector and jurisdiction of your choice prior to the authorization of a firm. Explain the goal and methodology of this assessment, as well as the importance of it to the company, and give examples to demonstrate the approach taken.
DRAFTING NOTES: The writer must choose an example of corporate governance failure in a regulated organization that occurred during the last five years. Regrettably, there are a lot of them to select from (a number of which are referred to throughout the earlier Units of the course text). Following the selection of such an example, a successful response should briefly summarize what occurred (with an emphasis on a description rather than more broadly writing about, as well as relative brevity) and then assess the ramifications for the firm involved (so there should be some form of assessment apparent). The writer should express their opinions, which should be obvious, on the lessons that may be gained from that failure – this is the subject of the second half of the inquiry. The goal is to show that you have a practical understanding of corporate governance and its importance.
Q4
Thomas works in the compliance department of a firm regulated in the jurisdiction and industry of your choice. His line manager, the head of regulatory compliance, has asked him to participate to an upcoming training day for new team members by drafting a document that would serve as the basis for part of the training. In this, he must show why and how a wide range of events such as an economic downturn, the emergence of scandals, or other significant events have the potential to influence the development of regulation in that jurisdiction, as well as explain the significance of this development for firms regulated within that jurisdiction and sector.
Discuss why and how events such as an economic downturn, the emergence of scandals, or other significant events, with reference to the above scenario and the fundamental objectives of regulation, have the potential to influence the development of regulation in your chosen jurisdiction and sector, and highlight and recommend the most important messages you, as a compliance professional, would waNOTES FOR DRAWING: This question is based on material covered in earlier units of the course book. Regulatory emphasis, themes, supervisory requirements, the fit and properness test, and broader subjects such as reputation are all possible factors in addressing this question, which uses fine data to examine the writer’s comprehension of why the regulator’s focus is important to regulated firms. In a good response, the writer should highlight one of the themes seen in recent fines levied by a regulator in a sector of their choice, using appropriate examples to support their arguments. Themes such as individual focus, honesty and integrity, system and control flaws, fine size, and so on are examples of what might be obvious, but what matters here is not so much the theme that the candidate highlights as it is how they have supported their comments on this through their choice of examples to illustrate their views. Specifically, the writer must discuss (i.e., include facts and some interpretation from various sides of the argument, with the goal of reaching a conclusion, rather than simply writing about the subject matter) and make clear what can be inferred from these themes about the regulator’s current and intended focus (this is an opportunity for the candidate).
Q.5 The regulator’s transparency and accountability are critical to the regulatory system’s performance.
Evaluate the responsibilities of the regulator(s), demonstrating how the regulator’s transparency and accountability are ensured and demonstrating the relevance of this for the overall effectiveness of the regulatory system, with reference to the chosen jurisdiction, regulated sector of IT, and the above statement. You should include instances to back up your ideas.
NOTES ON DRAWING: This question provides the writer with an open opportunity to demonstrate their thoughts on a problem of practical importance that is a part of the field’s discussion. Reasonable responses will show that the writer has considered and discussed the various factors that contribute to the statement (i.e., facts and their interpretation from various sides of the argument should be included with the goal of arriving at a conclusion), but the broad nature of the question phrasing allows the writer to be open in their approach and, in doing so, demonstrates that they have considered and discussed the various factors that contribute to the statement (i.e., there should be inclusion of the facts and their interpretation from various sides of the argument The question stated in the statement will have been addressed in an effective response, and this should serve as the backdrop for the discussion. There should be some kind of assessment of the impact of various approaches on GRC activities, which requires the writer to consider the impact of working in an environment/culture that focuses solely on meeting minimum requirements (for example, box-ticking, doing the bare minimum, etc.) versus working in one where everyone acts ethically (i.e. where meeting expectations re compliance is part of normal day-to-day business practice). Each of these conflicting business cultures would have a significant practical impact on how the firm and its employees perceived compliance and related activities, with clear implications for many, including the compliance function and how they approach their work. In brief, the writer has a wide range of topics from which to choose in their discussion, with examiners hoping to see addressing of the many parts and assessing primarily on how successfully the writer has used their topic selection to answer the question’s major theme.
The writer should provide examples that are relevant to the chosen issues and the debates that surround them. Real-life examples are preferable, but illustrative examples are also acceptable.Please use at least ten sources, including the International Compliance Association’s (ICA) web publications, as well as scholarly literature and other relevant materials. Note: Plagiarism-free content is required. Turnitin detection software will be used to check for passages found elsewhere on the Internet, in books and journals, or in previously submitted work. All citations must be in accordance with the Blueprint citation edition 19th edition or later.
300-word explanation and response
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!