Science and Pseudoscience Homework Assignment Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Description
Science and Pseudoscience Homework Assignment
Preparation and Submittal Instructions (Advice: check these off as you complete each component)
Use the assigned readings for data to complete this assignment. They can be found on the course website for this module.
b. See the schedule/website for due date!
Include your name, date, and the name of the assignment at the top of the paper.
Use a file name and assignment that includes your name and the assignment name, such as MyLastNameSciencePseudoscience.doc.
Save and submit the file as a Microsoft Word for Windows document for PC’s, not as an Apple or Mac document. Never submit work as an Adobe file.
Use a 12 or 13 point type size. Use 1.5 spacing and 1” margins. The font is up to you. Use a reasonable and respectful style. The paper must be correctly formatted.
Spell-check, proof read, and correct all errors and typos.
Paper must be formatted correctly. No cover page, please!All submittals will automatically go through ‘Turnitin.com’ on the course website and will be reviewed for plagiarism. No password is needed. I suggest following the advice in the course syllabus to avoid plagiarism problems—sometimes it’s unintentional, but we must all try our best to avoid the problem of copying the work of others. Violations are likely to be reported to the college Dean.
In answering the questions, cite the articles required for this paper correctly using in-text citations and a bibliography of works cited, such as this (Stockdale, 2008). For every in-text citation, include a full citation in a “Works Cited” section at the end of the paper. Be certain to provide the Works Cited page.Using full sentences or key phrases, respond to each of the questions below. Avoid redundancy and vague statements. Be concise, direct, clear, and accurate. Opinions or value judgments must be carefully considered and tempered with data. Be certain to use appropriate facts, data, and terminology in your paper. Use quotes as needed followed by a proper reference, example: “Blah, blah, doh-ti-doh” (Tillman, 2008).
Number each page (use the numbering feature in your word processor).
Submit this assignment to the course website as a single document (chart and essay in a single file).
Failure to follow instructions may result in a score of zero. No late papers are accepted in this course. However, “paper amnesty day” may be used to submit one missed assignment (see the schedule).
The chart for collecting and evaluating data from the reading is on a following page and must be included.Overview
Our course included an introduction to the issue of a growing human population. The environmental issues overview lecture noted that the human population has more than doubled since the 1960’s. The current generation (that would be you!) must consider the ability to feed an increasing population (which has more than doubled since the 1960’s), how we can feed everyone better (better nutritional value), and methods to grow and distribute food. Food commodities are traded globally. While a significant quantity of food is grown for animals, which is the food choice for “richer” peoples worldwide, we will focus on agriculture methods that produce food for direct human consumption.
In this assignment, we will compare and contrast data from a variety of sources to evaluate whether the contention that “organic farming can feed the world” has scientific merit or is pseudoscience (is it science or pseudoscience?). We will also learn how to collect and process information for analysis by using a chart to organize information for analysis. Our basic quest is, of the articles assigned for this project, which has scientific merit and why?
Base your assessment of the scientific validity of three articles. They can be found on the course website. Read and evaluate the three articles for their credibility, scientific or pseudoscientific approach and based on that analysis, state whether you find the topic—can organic agriculture feed the world’s population–has scientific support or if it is pseudoscience. Be certain to have the read the course material prior to beginning this assignment, including the article on “determining science vs. pseudoscience.”
The first is an article by Dr. Thomas DiGregori. The second is an article by Dr. Christos Vasilikiotis. The third excerpts parts of a paper by Dr. Stockdale and colleagues. You can find the articles on the course website.
Instructions
After reviewing these articles organize data by completing the chart (see below) and then use the collected data to answer the questions listed below. Our goals are:
1) learn how to collect and organize information for analysis
2) learn how to analyze the information
3) draw a reasonable conclusion using a scientific approach
4) apply a well-reasoned and considered opinion that explains whether organic agriculture can feed the world’s population can be supported by science or if the opinion(s) are pseudoscience, and
5) to write a clear paper with proper formatting, reasonable quality, and few if any spelling errors.
Part 1: The Chart
To help us get started, let’s learn how to collect data for assessment. Use the chart on the following page to assemble detailed information on each of the three articles. The data in the chart will be used to collect and then present basic evidence from “both sides” of the issue in the three articles. The collected evidence determines which paper(s) has scientific merit. The chart is based on standards that are useful in separating pseudoscience from science. Copy the table, insert your responses, and submit it for grading. Title and refer to this chart as “Table A.” Please note
Part 2: The Short Answer Section
Use data from the chart exercise to make well-reasoned conclusions in response to each of the following questions. Copy the list of questions, including subtitles, into your own document and follow each question with your response. Note how the questions are listed in a way that could be used in essay, however, do not write an essay. Each question must be numbered as they are here. Questions must be in italic. Responses must be in standard text.
Introduction Components
1. Discuss the “problem statement,” (what is the issue we are addressing?)
2. Who are the authors and what are their qualifications?
3. Using the article provided in the module, clearly define pseudoscience. Explain why we need to be cautious of pseudoscience with this issue.
4. Discuss appropriate standards to judge whether a scientific paper or issue has scientific merit from one with pseudoscience. (see the article by Saupe on this which is on the course website)
Discussion Section: Provide references when referring to authors in the study—like this (Author, Year).
5. Present the basic evidence on both sides of the issue (conventional vs organic)
6. Address any experiments (name and describe them) that were conducted that support each side.
7. Of the three articles, which one(s) meet the most criteria for solid science and why (support your opinion).
8. Discuss which of articles show evidence of a pseudoscientific approach to the topic. Present the evidence. Note: Unsubstantiated opinions will be penalized with a lower score.
Conclusion Section: Based on the discussion (and all that it includes) clearly state your opinion
9. Explain which author you side with and explain your reasoning.
10. Answer the question: “can organic agriculture can feed the world?” Explain the scientific support or lack of scientific support, pseudoscience.
Works Cited:
11. Provide a works cited section with the correct citations for each of the articles.
Table for Evaluating Article Credibility and Determining Pseudoscience
1) Respond to each of the questions below.
2) For “yes” answers, give an example.
3) Provide yes/no responses with evidence/reasoning
Table A
Review Standards
DiGregori
Vasilikiotis
Stockdale, et. al
What are the author’s credentials? Do they appear to have expertise in the field? Give credentials.
Might the author stand to profit in some way from a particular conclusion?
Does the article appear in a peer-reviewed journal? Has it had some editorial review?
Are findings from other peer-reviewed studies cited in the paper? Example?
Does the article cite well-respected scientists directly? Example?
Are biased sources cited? Example?
Does the author thoroughly evaluate competing views and hypotheses?
Is the author logical in her/his interpretation?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!