Death With Dignity Scenario Reflection Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Description
To complete each scenario assignment:
Complete the entire scenario.
Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you feel is the most ethical and why?Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, as well as other sources as needed.
Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate1
These are the four scenarios 1-41.DR.Mahal’s assessment of the law is reasonable . The death with Dignity act is carefully constructed and protects both the doctor and the patient. In order for PAS to be legal, the patient must be sane and properly informed about the potential alternative. This is an ethical template that order states considering such a law might be encouraged to adopt.
2.Robin is hitting on some important points, particularly with regard to other ethical options. It is entirely possible that the information patient the patent is spiritual nature, not clinical, and these should be an opportunity to provide that.
3.The waiting period is actually too long. If a patient is already suffering to the point that he /she wants to die, waiting an additional 15 days sounds like something akin or torture. There should be a way to expedite the process, perhaps retroactive filing and a decision that relies more heavily on the doctor’s immediate judgment.4. This a bad idea from the start. Regardless of one’s personal belief, state-sponsored suicide is not good precedence anymore. The message sent here is that life is not scary. If we open that door, any number of undesirable outcomes to follow”.
This what I wrote however you change something things around to organize my essay, pleaseOregon is one of the many states in the United States, which legalized physician-assisted suicide. On October 27, 1997, Oregon passed legislative law Death with Dignity Act, allowing the terminally ill to voluntarily end their lives by committing suicide with self-administration and lethal medications. The medication is prescribed by a physician for the patient due to excruciating pain the patient is feeling. It cannot be given by a family member or friend, or physician; only the patient is allowed to take meds.
However, there is a specific age requirement in Oregon; you must qualify for physician suicide and must evaluate the doctors to begin treatment. The state wants the patient to be at least 18 years older, considered an adult. The patient must be capable of deciding for themselves.
Furthermore, some doctor has the right to decline medical treatment so that they can protect their license. In that case, the patient may be referred to another doctor to get the help they need. The American Medical Association indicated permitting physicians to engage in assisted suicide would ultimately cause more harm than good to the patient. The physician in the hospital has to have written documentation stating you permit them to take full control of patient health welling being.
In the video, I feel most ethical towards Dr. Meadow’s concept of dignity with death. She thoroughly explains her perspective on how she feels about it. She also argues that the doctor should convince the patience to try an alternative method, such as seeking a professional psychologist evaluation instead of committing suicide. On the other hand, Dr. Mannal disagrees with her statement. He is a strong advocate in enforcing physician suicide. He also tries to persuade other doctors why PAS is essential. Although he believes it is necessary to end human life. He feels it is very beneficial for the patient and the family member. At the end of the video, the scenario indicated,”
This a bad idea from the start. Regardless of one’s personal belief, state-sponsored suicide is not good precedence anymore. The message sent here is that life is not scary. If we open that door, any number of undesirable outcome to follow” I agree with the concepts because the patient should have the right to change their mind at any given moment and not go through with medication.
I believe it provides the patient with lose hope, and they feel they have no reason to live if everybody is in agreement with them taking their life away. The purpose of the patient dying with dignity is a personal choice we chose in life. This is not planned. God has for our life. God wants us to live an internal, happy, peaceful, and stress-free life.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
|