INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND THEORY FRAMEWORK
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND THEORY FRAMEWORK
THIS ASSIGNMENT IS IN TWO PARTS
PART 1 6 PAGES (5-7 minimum references)
PART 2 10 PAGES (8-10 minimum references)TOPICS
INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND THEORY FRAMEWORK
APPLICATION OF ANALYSIS METHODS AND TECHNIQUESPlease incorporate the course text as a reference
Part 1 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND THEORY FRAMEWORK
(Topical Area- Social Equity)Assignment Overview
In defining and addressing an issue in the realm of public administration, it is essential to study and understand the proper theoretical framework that is related to that issue. In this first assignment, you will introduce the nature of your public administration topical area, define the central issue, and apply a theoretical framework related to the central issue. You will align the perspective to the theoretical framework within its topical area. This assignment will introduce you to theories and concepts, which will prepare you for more operational work in later assignments. It is important to incorporate source material such as GAO, OMB, and CBO.
Assignment Instructions
In a 6-page paper, address the following:Part 1: Introduction
• Describe the issue in the chosen topical area from a public administration perspective.
o Properly identify the context of the issue as related to a model of federalism.Part 2: Background and Definition
• Define the focus of your analysis of the issue in terms of involvement of the state legislature or courts.
o Include any relevant ethical, diversity, and equity concerns related to your topical area.
o Incorporate research from literature and public source material (GAO, OMB, et cetera).Part 3: Identification and Application of Theoretical Framework
Align the theoretical framework with the topical area within the proper realm of public administration.
. Identify the key manner in which this alignment informs the nature of the topic to the interaction with the theoretical framework.Analyze how the chosen theoretical framework is used within its topical area.
Apply the theoretical framework effectively to its topical area.
0 Identify areas of concern as directed by interactions with the topical area.
o Provide insight into how the theory informed the practice.
o Provide direction for approaching the topical area in a meaningful way.Evaluate the impact of the theoretical framework on the chosen topical area.
o Describe how measured outcomes are being received—is there proper classification, or are there related expenditures?
o Identify any larger issues that could be mitigated by training.Submission Requirements
• APA guidelines: Resources and citations must be formatted according to current APA style and formatting. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.
• Resources: Your ideas must be supported with relevant scholarly sources that are dated within the past five years and are properly cited and referenced in current APA style.
• Length of paper: 6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and references.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.Course Text
Kettl, D. F. (2018). Politics of the administrative process (7th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Part 2 APPLICATION OF ANALYSIS METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
(Topical Area- Social Equity)Assignment Overview
In the first assignment, you analyzed and aligned your theoretical framework within its topical area. For this assignment, you will apply your analysis to the creation of a management plan.
For the purpose of this course, a management plan is an approach to engage action with your topical area of concern based on key analysis of evaluative criteria pertaining to this area of public administration and management. The aim of this plan is to help you organize your insights from your review of the literature concerning how this area can be mitigated or managed more effectively in the practitioner realm.In this assignment, you will construct a management plan to address the nature of the issue related to your topical area, develop evaluative criteria to judge the merits of your management plan, and apply the appropriate analytical methods to assess the nature of your management plan as related to your chosen theoretical framework. You will also identify and explore the impact and insights provided by other theories as suggested by this analysis, identify recommendations based on the findings of the topical analysis, and provide a conclusion related to your management plan.
Assignment Instructions
In a 10page plan, address the following:Apply an appropriate perspective of public administration to your management plan as it relates to your topical area.
o Relate theory and perspective to the topical area.
o Identify problem components of the theory in terms of operations. Identify any key issues.
o Explore the manner in which the theory is made operational and relate it to an outcome.Identify alternative strategies to address the topical area from a public administration perspective.
Develop evaluative criteria to judge the merits of the management plan.
o Consider the following questions:
o Are all concerns related to the topical area addressed?
o What are the outcomes?
o Does the management plan offer the potential to address issues?
o How is quality being measured?
o Does the plan improve the effectiveness of this topical area of the project, program, or initiative?Evaluate diversity and equity considerations related to the nature and scope of the management plan.
o Define equity as it relates to your program.
o Consider how this embeds itself in management.
o Consider how this relates to the plan.Evaluate the political context related to the nature and scope of the management plan as framed by public administration perspectives.
o Consider the implications pertaining to the political context and federalism.Develop suitable recommendations based on the findings of your analysis pertaining to the construct of the management plan.
o Identify gaps based on your analysis.
o Identify any innovations that arose through your analysis.Submission Requirements
• APA guidelines: Resources and citations must be formatted according to current APA style and formatting. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.
• Resources: Your ideas must be supported with relevant scholarly sources that are dated within the past five years and are properly cited and referenced in current APA style.
• Length of paper: 10 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and references.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.Course Text
Kettl, D. F. (2018). Politics of the administrative process (7th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Course Readings
Hall, T. E., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2000). Structures for policy implementation: An analysis of national legislation, *** and ***. Administration & Society, 31(6), 667–686.Klinger, D. E., Nalbandian, J., & Romzek, B. S. (2002). Politics, administration, and markets: Conflicting expectations and accountability. American Review of Public Administration, 32(2), 117–144.
Loyens, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2010). Toward a theoretical framework for ethical decision making of street-level bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 42(1), 66–100.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2013). Reflections on “Public Administration Theory and the Separation of Powers.” American Review of Public Administration, 43(4), 381–396.
Verschuere, B., & Bach, T. (2012). Executive agencies, ministers, and departments: Can policy and management ever be separated? Administration & Society, 44(2), 183–206.
Wilk, E. M., & Lamb, C. M. (2011). Federalism, efficiency, and civil rights enforcement. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 392–404.
Wise, C. R., & Christensen, R. K. (2005). A full and fair capacity: Federal courts managing state programs. Administration & Society, 37(5), 576–610.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!