significance of safeguards in unethical research practices
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Over the past three weeks, you have been learning about the qualitative and quantitative research process. You have gained insights into the different methods for conducting nursing research. Prior to any research being conducted, a potential research study is reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and/or an ethics committee at the institution where data will be collected.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be able to:
- Explain the significance of safeguards that are in place to prevent unethical research practices.
- Explain the importance of protecting research participants’ safety through understanding unethical research practices.
- Apply the principles of the Nuremberg Code and The Belmont Report to past and current research studies.
Resources
- Textbook: Foundations of Nursing Research
- Article: Lest We Forget: The Tuskegee Experiment
- Article: The Nuremberg Code: A Critique
- Website: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (n.d.). Ethical Codes & Research Standards
- Website: The Belmont Report and The Nuremberg Code
- PPT File: Chapter 4
- (Optional) Video: Miss Evers Boys
- File: 7th Edition APA Style Bible Citations
Background Information
The Tuskegee study is a true event that occurred in 1932 in Macon County, Alabama in which African Americans were promised treatment for “bad blood.” This study was marred by numerous ethical misconducts. Events such as the Tuskegee study, the Nuremberg trials, and other unethical research practices led to the creation of The Nuremberg Code and The Belmont Report. The principles in these documents were created to protect participants from unethical research practices.
Instructions
- Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
- Read Chapter 4 in the textbook.
- Read the article, The Nuremberg Code: A Critique.
- Read the article, Lest We Forget: The Tuskegee Experiment.
- View the Chapter 4 PowerPoint file.
- Visit the following website and review The Belmont Report and The Nuremberg Code. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (n. d.). Ethical Codes & Research Standards
- (Optional) Watch the movie, Miss Evers’ Boys. (If it prompts you to log in to view the video, use your MyIWU Portal username – everything before “@” in your IWU email address – and your Portal password)
- Prepare to discuss the following Discussion Prompts:
- Describe three principles of the Nuremberg Code and explain how one of these principles is important to nursing research.
- Describe three ethical principles from the Belmont Report and explain how one of these principles applies to informed consent, risk/benefit assessment, and/or selection of participants.
- Describe the purpose of the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
- What values would be threatened if these principles had not been put in place? Support your answer witha verse from the Bible. 7th Edition APA Style Bible Citations provides standards for citing and referencing scripture Instructions below and resources are attached. There’s no need to watch the movie as it is optional. The article should be enough to complete the assignment. Length should be 3-4 paragraphs minimum, APA 7th edition with references. There is another reference to be included and that a bible reference. I will include a resource of how she wants bible scripture referenced.Research and select at least two current scholarly sources to support your explanations and insights. Research and select at least two current scholarly sources to support your explanations and insights.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!