AI weapon human-machine interaction ethics
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
AI weapon human-machine interaction ethics
Autonomous weapons, also known as killer robots or lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS), are military systems that are capable of selecting and engaging targets without human intervention. The development and deployment of such weapons raise significant ethical, legal, and strategic concerns, and there is ongoing debate about the appropriate governance of human-machine interaction in this context.
One of the key ethical concerns with autonomous weapons is the question of accountability. If a weapon makes a mistake, or if it is hacked or otherwise compromised, who is responsible for the resulting harm? With a human operator, it is clear that the individual or the military organization that employs them bears responsibility. However, with autonomous weapons, it is less clear who should be held accountable. This lack of accountability could also have implications for the laws of war, and the principle of distinction, which requires that parties to a conflict distinguish between civilians and combatants.
Another ethical concern is the question of whether autonomous weapons can be programmed to meet the requirements of international humanitarian law (IHL), which sets out the rules governing the conduct of armed conflict. IHL requires that all weapons be capable of being used in a manner that is consistent with the principles of distinction and proportionality, but it is unclear whether autonomous weapons can meet these requirements.
In terms of legal concerns, there is currently no specific international treaty or national legislation that specifically regulates the development, deployment, or use of autonomous weapons. This lack of legal framework means that there is no clear guidance on what is or is not acceptable, and it also means that there is a risk that autonomous weapons could be used in ways that violate IHL.
Strategically, autonomous weapons could have a destabilizing effect on the balance of power between nations. If one country develops and deploys autonomous weapons, it could give them a significant military advantage over others. This could lead to an arms race, as other countries seek to develop their own autonomous weapons in order to keep pace. Additionally, the use of autonomous weapons could change the nature of warfare, making it more unpredictable and increasing the risk of unintended escalation.
Given these concerns, there have been calls for the development of international governance mechanisms to regulate the development, deployment, and use of autonomous weapons. This could include a ban on the development and deployment of autonomous weapons, or a set of rules and guidelines for the responsible use of these weapons.
One potential approach is the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, a coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that is calling for a preemptive ban on the development, production, and use of fully autonomous weapons. This would involve the negotiation of a new international treaty that would prohibit the development, production, and use of fully autonomous weapons, similar to the bans on chemical and biological weapons.
Another potential approach is the development of guidelines for the responsible use of autonomous weapons. This could include a set of principles for the development and use of autonomous weapons, such as the requirement for human oversight of the weapon’s decision-making process, and the requirement that the weapon be capable of being used in a manner that is consistent with IHL.
In conclusion, the development and deployment of autonomous weapons raise significant ethical, legal, and strategic concerns, and there is ongoing debate about the appropriate governance of human-machine interaction in this context. While there is no clear consensus on the best approach, there is a growing call for international governance mechanisms to regulate the development, deployment, and use of autonomous weapons, such as a ban on the development and deployment of autonomous weapons, or a set of rules and guidelines for the responsible use of these weapons. The governance of autonomous weapon systems is a complex and challenging issue that requires further discussion and collaboration among nations, international organizations and civil society
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
AI weapon human-machine interaction ethics
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!