Leadership Models Discussion Response 1
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Leadership Models Discussion Response 1
Leadership, Models, Discussion, Response
Reply 1
Alexandra
Research one of the three theories (presented in Chapter 18) for planned change and how that process could be applied to a real nursing change situation.
According to chapter 18, there are 3 theories developed when it came to planned change needed in the nursing field. One of the theories is called Six Phases of Planned Change that was developed back in 1973 by Ronald Havelock.
Havelock argued that adapting Lewin’s change model to include knowledge building, which focused on a systematic integration of theories rather than disjointed approaches, would respond more effectively to real-life situations in managing change (Wagner, 2020). The six stages for this theory are as follows:
(1) building a relationship,
(2) diagnosing the problem,
(3) acquiring relevant resources,
(4) choosing the solution,
(5) gaining acceptance,
(6) stabilizing the innovation and generating self-renewal. This can be applied to a real nursing change situation because not only can it assist with any random problem-solving process needed, it exemplifies how a nursing assessment is somewhat conducted.
For example, building a trusting therapeutic relationship with a patient is the first to gain their trust, then there’s the process of assessing and diagnosing the problem indicated. Therefore, implementing necessary interventions to resolve the problem and formulate a solution.
References
Wagner, J. (2020, August 13). 10.4: Planned Change. Retrieved from Medicine Libre Texts: https://med.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Nursing/Book%3A_Leadership_and_Influencing_Change_in_Nursing_(Wagner)/10%3A_Common_Change_Theories_and_Application_to_Different_Nursing_Situations/10.04%3A_Planned_Change
Reply 2
Is from what you wrote she asked a question for me to answer. Her question is (What is the difference between first order and second order change?)
The planned change is the preparation process for the whole organization for new objectives, directions, or at least a significant component. The guidelines may include culture, internal structures, measures, records, and processes. The Lewin model offers the foundation for understanding the transformation of companies.
It was conceived by Kurth Lewin and underwent three phases (Hussain et al., 2018). The Lewin change model states that it is necessary to enhance the causes of the changes in the organization and diminish the forces or elements to support the maintenance of a current state. The results are less stress and less reluctance to change.
In this model, there are three main steps, including unfreezing, moving, and refreeze (Fernandez et al., 2020). Unfreezing reduces the variables that sustain existing corporate behavior at the current level. The reasons for psychological disconfirmation can induce freezing.
However, moving shifts present organizational behavior, whether individual or departmental, to a different level. Interfering with the present system to develop new attitudes and ideas and necessary administrative reform is also required. Moreover, refreeze during this stage, the organizational balance is stabilized. Supporting processes and procedures are used to achieve refreezing, which forces the new administrative state (Fernandez et al., 2020).
Managers should assess their leadership skills and limits before embarking on a change project since these can substantially influence the project’s success (Zhang, 2019). Research indicates that the most critical factors for planned change are leadership, good communication, and cooperation (Zhang, 2019).
The numerous changes that nurse leaders face need new ways of thinking about change leadership and adjusting to new ways of working. Additionally, leaders engage closely with frontline caregivers to design workplace improvements, contributing to better working conditions and patient care.
As a result, nurse leaders must have the skills essential to influence human behavior, such as supervisory ability, knowledge, tenacity, and a drive to achieve. Even though Lewin’s change model is well-known and accepted mainly in care delivery, it is often critiqued for being too basic. This is because change may be unexpected and challenging, a competent leader must know a range of change models.
References
Fernandez, N., Leduc, N., Fon, N., Ste-Marie, L., Nguyen-Dinh, D., & Boucher, A. (2020). Recognizing change in post-graduate medical education using the organizational knowledge creation model. Creative Education, 11(05), 783-796. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.115056
Hussain, S., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M., Hussain, S., & Ali, M. (2018). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal Of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002
Zhang, Y. (2019). Research on employee pressure and resistance caused by organizational change—a case study of Jingyi network co., ltd. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(5), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.75005
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!