Huawei Company Ethical Issue Research Paper
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Huawei Company Ethical Issue Research Paper
Huawei, Company, Ethical, Issue, Research, Paper
Huawei is one of the leading companies that have secured a broad market scope in providing information communication technology infrastructure in the world.
Over the last few years, the company has experienced a vigorous transformation that has enhanced the degree of integrated IT solutions (Shambaugh,2013).
Huawei advocates and promotes the establishment of cyber security standards that are globally recognized and agreed upon. Huawei has also been actively participating with industry standards organizations to promote the establishment of new standards.
Legal formation
The company was founded in 1987 as a private company which was wholly owned by h employee. About 80,000 have owned shareholders in Huawei, holding the largest share of 1.4 % of the total stock.
This has enabled the company to operate under an established legal framework. I dispute the fact that the business has been perceived and associated with the legal and unethical issues (Trisale, 2019).
Huawei not only participates in existing industry standards organizations, but also advocates the establishment of new industry standards organizations. For example:
To build a globally unified machine-to-machine (M2M) standards platform and promote the healthy development of the M2M market, Huawei and Qualcomm launched the M2M Industry Group in 2010. Since July 2011, seven standards developing organizations (SDOs) have participated in the M2M Industry Group and organized four face to face (F2F) preparation meetings. In July 2012, the OneM2M standards organization was officially established.
In this regard, the company is guided by a code of ethics in all the undertakings. This has influenced and raised concerns because of the high growth rate that the company is experiencing. The article does not identify and validate the aforementioned dubious means and equipment that were acquired illegally. In an insight, this is a challenge that emerges after a business propels and secures a broad scope in the market (Trisale, 2019).
Openness, competition, and collaboration are the basic principles Huawei adopts to enhance its core competencies and build a favorable business ecosystem. An enterprise supply chain is actually a business ecosystem that ties together customers, partners, suppliers, and manufacturers.
An enterprise can survive over the long term only when it strengthens cooperation with others, focuses on the interests of its customers and partners, and pursues success for all. Only when Huawei helps its customers create value can it find its position in the value chain.
The Huawei business service was taken was accessed and verified to carry out its operation by the international standard organization in 2015. This was a clear indication that the business has a long term focus, which increased the customer’s expectation hence growing their number capabilities. All the cases that have been filed have not by any time given a ruling that proves this unethical indulgence (Toni, 2016).
Third, Huawei refuses to be opportunistic in the face of big opportunities. The company is not distracted by short-term interests and temptations and does not dwell on sunk costs that may be incurred.
conclusion
If such a case happened to my corporate business of spreading rumor misconduct, the illegality of property and acquisition, and other wrongdoing, I would move with speed to seek proper attention.
This act can affect the business customers and the volumes of sales; as a result, I would be necessary to market the business against the incitement from the competing firms (Shambaugh,2013).
Huawei creates value primarily through its business operations. The primary task of its financial management department is to support and oversee business departments in creating value. Financially, what are the key points that Huawei focuses on as it creates value?
First, Huawei looks at business from an investment perspective and views opportunities strategically. Second, Huawei has always followed the principles of focusing on its core business and keeping a sharp focus in resource allocation. Third, Huawei refuses to be opportunistic in the face of big opportunities.
Reference
Shambaugh, D. (2013). China goes global: The partial power. Oxford University Press.
Toni, A. F. (2016). International operations management: Lessons in global business. CRC Press.
Trisale. (2019). Huawei’s security standards and certification. Retrieved from https://www.huawei.com/ke/about-huawei/trust-center/transparency/standard-certification.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!