Leadership Theories Adopted in The Managerial Process
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Leadership Theories Adopted in The Managerial Process
Leadership approaches describe the methods and the different models that are adopted in the managerial process by the managers who act as the leaders of the organization. The styles range from small businesses to huge and wide businesses. The contingency and the path theories are ways taken up in the analyzing leadership. Which analyze and describe the different models taken up by leaders and the followers and the strategies that are taken up. The relationship between the leaders the followers as well as the main basics taken up also are defined in the models of the leadership.
The contingency theory is a behavioral theory which is based on the view that there is not a specific best way to lead an organization make a decision or to organize cooperation. The theory must take account of the situations in which the leaders operate (Paulsen, 2013). The theory spells that the moves and decisions as well as the leadership systems are influenced by both the external and the internal factors. Basically there is no single theory of contingency management rather there are certain important contingencies for organizations which are the technology, customers and competitors, suppliers, distributers the government (Quader, 2011). In addition the decision making process for any organization is determined by a variety of factors. These factors range from the importance of the decision, the amount and nature of the available information, the likelihood of the decision to be accepted by the subordinates to how well the employees are motivated. This theory proposes that a person’s actions cannot be predetermined. However they are dependent on the situation at that moment and instance.
The contingent theory of management emphasizes that the effectiveness of leadership is dependent on the combination and the matching between the leadership style and the situation. Hereby the situation is defined in terms of the relation between the leader and the member; measure of the leadership acceptance between the different hierarchies in the organization, the task structure; a measure of the clarity of the tasks or projects as well as the positional power which measures the amount of authority the leader has to influence the productivity of the followers.
The leaders style is defined as either task or relations oriented. These tasks are simply the projects that are taken up and the relations are defined as the different relations that exist between the leaders and the followers (McShane & Glinow, 2014). The contingency theory is one of the more common leadership theories. Its basis is that leadership emerges when different kinds of people are encased in different kinds of situations.
The path goal theory of leadership was developed to describe the way that the leaders encourage and support their followers in the achievement of the goals set by setting up a clear and easy path to be taken in the goal attainment process (Quader, 2011). The leaders take up the role to clarify the path to be taken by the followers, eliminate the roadblocks and the hindrances as well as the increasing of the rewards along the process.
This theory of leadership takes up several means and models of leadership and administrative structure. Supportive leadership is lined with the understanding of the employees’ needs and their welfare that then is used in the development of a friendly environment for their development and effective working. The development of the follower’s self-esteem and making the job more interesting are aimed by this system of leadership especially when the working environment is stressful and boring.
The path theory is a specific manifestation of the contingency theory. The path is one that is defined by struggle whereby much work is needed to be done to reach the laid goals. Leadership is crucial in this situation in that the nature of the path and the routes to be taken can end up being frustrating (McShane & Glinow, 2014).
A path theory of leadership stresses charisma and the motivation of the followers. It is a source of the motive power and enthusiasm which also stresses the idea that a leader should set out the nature of the route the team must travel in ensuring that the goal set is attained easily. The issues revolve around the nature of the route a team must take up to attain the set goals. The degree to which the leaders take up the role to make the path clear the easier it gets for the followers to attain the goals.
A directive leadership model of the path theory of leadership describes the model whereby the leaders tell the followers what they are supposed to do alongside giving the guidance along the way. The allocations of specific schedules and time or the specific work to be done are also taken up. The rewards may also be increased and the role ambiguity reduced in that the followers are made aware of what is required of them. This may be applied where the task is unstructured and complex and also when the follower is inexperienced. A sense of security for the follower as well as a definition of a clear line of control are defined and made clearer to the follower (Arbak, 2013).
Participative leadership is also another form of the path leadership that involves the consultative relation between the leader and the follower and the exchanging of ideas when making up decisions and taking up certain actions. The approach is taken up in cases whereby the followers are experts and their advice is needed and considered very relevant in the propelling of the organization.
Achievement oriented leadership being another mode of the path leadership theory which involves the setting of challenging goals both at work and in the self-improvement program. There is an expectation and demonstration of high standards (Lin, 2013). The leaders show a high degree of faith and reliance in the capabilities of the followers to succeed. The approach is taken up when the task is complex.
The path theory is defined by certain situational factors. These are the different aspects that affect the path that is taken up by the leaders as well as the success and the outcome of the entire program and the leadership program. The personality of the subordinates is one of these factors.
The locus of the control defines the nature of the leader. The subordinates perceived to have an internal locus of control are well suited by a participative leader (Vogt, 2013). This is a leader who takes participates readily in the operations of the firm and interacts readily with the subordinates in the decision making process. The satisfaction of each of the parties is highly influenced by the different situations as well as the provisions that the people are subjected to.
The kind of perception that the subordinates have in them also defines their personality (Arbak, 2013). This is important in affecting the kind of leadership that is used by the leaders. The subordinates who perceive themselves as having high ability do not like directive leadership.
The characteristics of the environment are also situational factors. The environments affect the effectiveness and the satisfaction of the entire leadership structure and the followers. Directive leadership is less effective and redundant in an environment when working on a high structure.
Workers satisfaction is undermined where there is a highly formal and authoritative leadership structure is taken up. This is a system whereby there is very high degree of command and there is limited freedom for the subordinates. The followers are subjected to many terms and conditions of operation making it hard for them to operate properly.
A well-formed team environment where there is developed team management and cooperation is one that eliminates the need for a very authoritative system (Vogt, 2013). This is based on the fact that in the case of such a system there is very high level of social support and development. The followers are able to motivate and support themselves making the entire project very successful and manageable. The supportive system is also made less necessary.
The path theory and the contingent theories illustrate certain key differences in the approach that is taken up in each of them. The differences stream from the various aspects that is the breadth of the theories, the main concepts and ideas behind the theories, as well as the basics used and adopted by the two theories.
In terms of the basics of the theories, the core of the contingency theory for instance is that leadership emerges from the situation when different kinds and groups of people are faced by different situations and circumstances. In such an instance when one finds themselves in a situation where they are well equipped and thrives easily, they most likely emerge successful. The path theory on the other hand takes up an approach that is a larger realm of contingency. In this the path is a manifestation of the contingency theory.
The path theories come into their own when the route that a team must travel appears difficult, long or vague (Lin, 2013). If the goal is formulated by the management is general, the purpose of the management in such a case is to clarify the ways through which the vague and the unclear goals are to be met. Upon laying the goals clarity of the aims is reached. The contingency theory is however broader and goes past these. The theory looks at all the possible situations and matches the different personality types to each of the situations where they can succeed as leaders. Generally the path approach is specific while the contingency approach is broad and wider.
Conclusively the contingency theory and the path theories of leadership as illustrated demonstrate certain key aspects and characteristics that are also used in distinguishing them.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!