Stressed Out and Burnout Nurses
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Case Analysis: Groupthink in the Sweat Lodge Assignment Instructions
Overview
For this assignment you will be analyzing and answering questions for the Groupthink in the Sweat Lodge Case Analysis. This Case Analysis assignment will help you examine elements representative of being a morally responsible team member, identify danger signs of ethical failure, and illustrate the role groupthink plays in the organizational culture. Each of these learning outcomes are valuable tools that can be utilized within an organizational setting, academic setting, or in everyday personal life situations.
Instructions
Read Groupthink in the Sweat Lodge from Case Study 8.2 on pages 254255 of the Johnson (2019) text. Respond to the following discussion probes (questions 16 are also listed in the textbook): see below for this case analysis
1. What other symptoms of groupthink (if any) do you see in this case?
2. Is groupthink a greater danger for spiritual groups than other types of groups? Why or why not?
3. What other ethical danger signs do you see in the sweat lodge tragedy?
4. What steps could retreat participants have taken to protect themselves and others?
5. Was Rays sentence too harsh or too light?
6. What do you learn from this case that you can apply as a group member?
7. Would you say that having a biblical worldview is compatible with a groupthink mindset? Why or why not?
Present your analysis and evaluation in an 8001,200-word paper prepared following current APA guidelines for professional papers. Be sure to support your conclusions with the text, Scripture, and at least 1 scholarly journal article. Include proper current APA citations and a reference list.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.Case Study 8.2: Groupthink in the Sweat Lodge
In October 2009, a group of spiritual seekers paid from $9,000 to $10,000 each to attend a five-day Spiritual Warrior Retreat near Sedona, Arizona, led by self-help expert and New Age guru James Arthur Ray. Ray is the author of the best-selling book Harmonic Wealth: The Secret of Attracting the Life You Want and is featured in the video The Secret. His company, James Ray International, took in over $9 million in 2008.
The Spiritual Warrior Retreat, which participants were told will push you beyond your perceived limits, included seminars, spiritual cleansing exercises, and other activities.1 The week culminated in a 36-hour vision quest without food or water in the desert, followed by a meal and a closing sweat lodge ceremony. The ceremony was designed as an intense rebirthing experience to help participants make significant life changes. Held in a 415-square-foot enclosure built of blankets and plastic sheeting surrounding a fire pit, the lodge could comfortably handle 20 to 25 people but was packed with 55 seekers that day. Heated rocks were placed in the fire pit every round and doused with water. Sandalwood (believed to be toxic when burned) was added to produce incense. Participants sat in darkness, while Ray, standing near the tent door, exhorted them to continue despite their extreme discomfort. He told the group, Play full on, you have to go through this barrier,2 and You will have to get to a point where you surrender and its O.K. to die.
The sweat lodge soon became what one reporter called a human cooking pot, searing the lungs of retreat-goers and baking their internal organs. Not only was the sweat lodge overcrowded, but also the plastic sheeting didnt let the steam escape, further increasing the temperature in the enclosure. Three people died, and 19 more received emergency medical treatment for dehydration, burns, breathing problems, organ failure, and elevated body temperature. Those who were in the lodge report that Ray ignored signs that something was terribly amiss. When people started vomiting, he declared that vomiting was good for you, that you are purging what your body doesnt want, what it doesnt need. When told that a woman had fainted just after he closed the enclosure door between rounds of the ceremony, Ray continued on, noting, We will deal with that after the next round.
Police and other observers wonder why participants didnt leave the tent even when they literally began to cook to death. (It should be noted that some might have been overcome before they could save themselves.) Escalation of commitment might be partially to blame. Retreat-goers spent thousands of dollars and invested several days in the event and wanted to continue to the end, hoping for a final spiritual breakthrough. However, groupthink appears to be a more significant contributing factor. The retreat experience put a good deal of pressure on participants to conform. They were isolated, under the direction of a powerful authority figure, and subjected to significant physical stress even before entering the sweat lodge. Thus, it is not surprising that followers displayed symptoms of groupthink. Ray allegedly pressured possible dissenters. He discouraged members from leaving the tent by his presence at the door and by telling those tempted to exit, You can do better than this.7 Individuals apparently engaged in self-censorship, keeping their doubts about the safety of the lodge to themselves. One client, for example, was troubled about a game played earlier in the week in which Ray (dressed in white robes) played God and ordered some participants to commit mock suicide. However, she didnt leave then because she didnt want to ruin the experience for others. There was also the illusion of unanimity. Some members of the group may have concluded that if the rest of the participants thought conditions in the lodge were tolerable, then it must be safe to stay. The darkness may have hidden the fact that others were in serious trouble.
Ray claimed that what happened in the lodge was a tragic accident, not a crime, and that he didnt know anyone was in distress. He and his attorneys and supporters argued that the participants were warned of the dangers of the experience (they signed waivers indicating that death could result). A nurse was on duty outside the lodge, and drinks were available. People were free to leave the lodge when they wished.
Ray was acquitted of manslaughter charges (which could have led to a sentence of 30 years) in 2011. He was convicted of three counts of negligent homicide instead, spent two years in prison, and was released in 2013. Since his release, Ray has mounted a comeback, declaring that self-help is exactly where I should be, and absolutely must be. He currently coaches entrepreneurs and has plans for a book and an online platform. Ray successfully petitioned a judge to restore his right to vote and to hold public office, though the judge refused to set aside his three convictions.
Members of the victims families feel that the New Age guru should have gotten a much longer sentence and are angry that he is filing motions to get his rights back while the rest of us [victims families] are all still living with the pain.9 They dont think Ray has taken full responsibility for the tragedy and is motivated to return to the self-help business by money, not to help others.
Discussion Probes
1. What other symptoms of groupthink (if any) do you see in this case?
2. Is groupthink a greater danger for spiritual groups than other types of groups? Why or why not?
3. What other ethical danger signs do you see in the sweat lodge tragedy?
4. What steps could retreat participants have taken to protect themselves and others?
5. Was Rays sentence too harsh or too light? Should his rights be restored and convictions set aside?
6. What do you learn from this case that you can apply as a group member? As a spiritual seeker?
Johnson, Craig E.. Organizational Ethics (pp. 254-255). SAGE Publications. Kindle Edition.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!